Empathy and Emotional Insight

The Connection Between Reading and Empathy

How stories may help readers understand other people, which kinds of reading seem most relevant, and the honest limits of what reading can and cannot do.

On this page
  1. What people usually mean by empathy
  2. Why stories are a plausible route
  3. Different kinds of reading, different contributions
  4. What research can and cannot tell us
  5. Honest limits
  6. Getting more from reading if empathy is your interest

What people usually mean by empathy

Empathy is a loose word. In everyday use it covers at least two separate things. One is understanding what another person is thinking or feeling, sometimes called perspective-taking. The other is feeling something in response, such as sharing a person’s distress or joy. A third idea, caring enough to help, is usually treated separately and is covered in its own article on compassion.

This matters because a book can do one of these without the others. A reader might follow a character’s reasoning perfectly and still feel nothing, or feel strongly without understanding much. When people say reading builds empathy, it helps to ask which part they mean.

Why stories are a plausible route

Most stories ask you to hold a point of view that is not your own. In a novel you often see a situation through someone’s thoughts, doubts and mistaken assumptions, something real life rarely offers. You can watch a character misread a friend, hide a fear or act against their own interest, and you get the reasons laid out on the page.

That is the core of the idea behind stepping into stories. Reading is a low-risk way to practice imagining another mind. Nobody is judging your guesses, and you can slow down, reread or put the book away.

Several features of reading fit this picture:

  • Access to inner life. Writing can show private thoughts that people seldom share aloud.
  • Time. A long book lets you stay with one person through many situations, not a single snapshot.
  • Unfamiliar settings. Stories can place you in a life, a place or a period you will never live in.
  • Mixed motives. Good characters are rarely only good or only bad, which can make quick judgments harder.

None of this guarantees an effect. It explains why the idea is reasonable.

Different kinds of reading, different contributions

The strongest link is usually drawn with reading fiction, but other forms can do related work. Biography and memoir present a real person’s account of events, which carries a different weight because the person actually lived it. Long-form journalism can describe the circumstances of people a reader would never meet. Essays and poems may offer a single feeling in compact form.

The idea of diverse perspectives is often tied to empathy, since a reader whose shelf includes many voices meets more kinds of experience. Variety is not a magic ingredient, though. A reader can pick up unfamiliar books and still read them only to confirm what they already think.

What research can and cannot tell us

This article reports no study of its own, so it is worth saying plainly what research in this area looks like in general. Researchers typically compare people who read more with people who read less, or ask participants to read a passage and then complete a short task about reading faces or social situations. Both designs have weaknesses.

  • People who read a lot may differ from others in many ways, such as education, personality or free time, so a link does not show that reading caused anything.
  • Short experiments often measure small, brief changes that may not last or carry into daily life.
  • Empathy is hard to measure. Tasks and questionnaires capture only part of it, and people may answer in ways they think are expected.
  • Results across studies have been mixed, and careful readers of this field tend to avoid strong conclusions.

A fair summary is that reading may support some aspects of understanding other people, especially for readers who engage closely, and that the size and durability of the effect is uncertain.

Honest limits

Reading cannot make anyone kind. Plenty of well-read people are unkind, and plenty of people who read little are generous and perceptive. Stories can also be used to confirm prejudice, and a book written from one narrow view may teach a reader to understand some people while overlooking others.

There is also a difference between understanding a character and understanding a neighbor. Fiction is shaped by an author, who decides what is shown. Real people are less tidy, and they can tell you that you got them wrong. Reading may prepare you for listening, but it does not replace it.

Finally, empathy is not always comfortable. If someone finds that strong feelings from reading become overwhelming or are tied to difficult personal experiences, speaking with a qualified professional is a sensible step.

Getting more from reading if empathy is your interest

If you want reading to widen your understanding, a few habits seem sensible and cost nothing:

  1. Notice your reactions. When you dislike a character, ask what the character might say in their own defense.
  2. Read beyond your usual shelf. Include voices, places and periods you rarely meet.
  3. Talk about what you read. A book club conversation often shows readings you had not considered.
  4. Share stories with children. Reading to children gives adults a chance to ask, simply, how a character might feel and why.
  5. Check your understanding against real people. Listening to others is the part reading cannot do for you.

Treat these as ways to read more thoughtfully, not as a program with guaranteed results. The most defensible claim is a modest one: stories offer practice at imagining other lives, and readers who take that practice seriously may find it carries over a little into the way they listen.

Keep exploring

Guides from other topics

All topics →